Within UAP Disclosure
How Congress Put UFO Disclosure on Camera
Public hearings made UAP a recurring oversight issue while separating testimony from proof of extraordinary claims.
On this page
- Why the hearings mattered politically
- What witnesses actually claimed
- What hearings can and cannot establish
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Congressional hearings became one of the UFO disclosure movement’s most powerful pressure points because they moved UAP, or unidentified anomalous phenomena, from podcasts, leaks, and defence rumours into public oversight. The most important change was not that Congress proved extraordinary claims about alien technology. It did not. The change was institutional: witnesses testified under oath, defence officials had to answer questions in public, and lawmakers began treating UAP as a problem of reporting systems, classification, contractor oversight, aviation safety, and public trust.
That distinction matters. Hearings can expose contradictions, force agencies to produce records, protect witnesses, and make secrecy politically costly. They cannot, by themselves, authenticate classified claims, validate sensor data, or prove that any object has non-human origins. The best way to understand the hearings is therefore as disclosure pressure: a mechanism that keeps the subject visible while forcing the government to separate unresolved evidence from unsupported claims.
Why the hearings mattered politically
For decades, UFO questions usually reached Congress indirectly: through letters, classified briefings, appropriations language, defence reporting requirements, and occasional public controversy. The modern shift came when UAP began appearing in formal oversight settings where the issue could be discussed as national security rather than only as belief, folklore, or entertainment.
The first major public reset came on 17 May 2022, when a House Intelligence subcommittee held what major news outlets described as the first public congressional hearing on UFOs in more than 50 years. Pentagon officials Ronald Moultrie and Scott Bray told lawmakers that military reporting had expanded and that the government was trying to standardise how sightings were collected and analysed. Reporting at the time noted that the Pentagon’s UAP database had grown to roughly 400 reports, compared with the smaller set discussed in the 2021 intelligence-community assessment. [Rev]rev.comTranscript of Congressional Hearing on UFOsCongress holds historic open hearing on UFOs 5/17/22 Transcript. House Intelligence Counter… [CBS News]cbsnews.comufo hearing congress pentagon watch live stream today 2022 05 17CBS NewsPentagon officials testify at first public UFO hearing in more…17 May 2022 — A House panel held the first public congressional…
That hearing mattered because it reframed UAP as an oversight problem. Instead of asking only whether any single video showed a mysterious craft, lawmakers asked how the Department of Defense handled reports, what pilots were supposed to do, what counted as sufficient evidence, and whether some cases involved foreign surveillance, sensor errors, drones, balloons, aircraft, or genuinely unresolved phenomena. The public message was modest but significant: UAP reports were no longer being treated as something military personnel should simply laugh off or bury.
The 26 July 2023 House Oversight hearing pushed the issue further into public view. Its title, “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency”, captured the political blend that made the hearing unusual: national-security concern, whistleblower allegations, pilot testimony, and a bipartisan demand for transparency. The official hearing record lists three witnesses: former Navy pilot Ryan Graves, retired Navy Commander David Fravor, and former intelligence official David Grusch. [Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National…Hearing Date: July 26, 2023 10:00 am 2154 Rayburn Uniden…
The 2023 hearing became a disclosure-movement landmark because it put three different types of claim on the same public stage. Graves spoke about routine pilot encounters and reporting stigma; Fravor recounted the 2004 “Tic Tac” incident associated with the USS Nimitz carrier group; Grusch alleged that hidden programmes had handled recovered non-human craft and that information had been improperly withheld from Congress. The hearing did not prove Grusch’s most extraordinary claims, but it changed the political problem: if even the allegation was that programmes were being concealed from Congress, the issue became not only “what is in the sky?” but “who has the authority to know?” [GovInfo]govinfo.govCHRG 118hhrg53022CHRG 118hhrg53022
By 13 November 2024, the House had held another major UAP hearing, “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth”, before two Oversight subcommittees. The official hearing page and Government Publishing Office record identify a new witness slate including Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Gold, and Michael Shellenberger. That hearing showed that UAP had become a recurring oversight subject rather than a one-off media spectacle. [Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National…Hearing Date: July 26, 2023 10:00 am 2154 Rayburn Uniden… GovInfo The political significance is not that every lawmaker agreed on what UAP are. They did not. The significance is that a coalition with differe [govinfo.gov]govinfo.govCHRG 118hhrg53022CHRG 118hhrg53022 nt motives could converge on the same oversight demand. Some lawmakers were interested in aviation safety, some in defence secrecy, some in whistleblower protection, some in contractor accountability, and some in the possibility of hidden extraordinary evidence. Public hearings gave those motives a shared procedural form: testimony, questions, records, and pressure on agencies to respond.
What witnesses actually claimed
The hearings are often remembered as if they made one single claim: that the US government admitted UFOs are alien craft. That is not what happened. The testimony was more layered, and the differences between witness types are central to understanding the disclosure movement’s congressional strategy.
Ryan Graves’ testimony focused on pilots and reporting culture. As a former Navy F/A-18 pilot and later founder of Americans for Safe Aerospace, he argued that UAP sightings were not rare curiosities for some aircrew and that stigma had discouraged reporting. His core claim was governance-oriented: pilots needed safe, standardised, serious reporting channels, and the public needed better transparency about objects operating in shared airspace. [Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National…Hearing Date: July 26, 2023 10:00 am 2154 Rayburn Uniden…
David Fravor’s testimony was different. He gave a first-hand account of the 2004 Nimitz encounter, describing an object whose behaviour he believed could not be explained by conventional aircraft known to him. This kind of testimony had public force because it came from a trained military aviator and was attached to a named incident, a carrier group, and sensor-linked reporting. But even strong first-hand testimony does not by itself establish origin. It can establish that a credible witness saw something unexplained; it cannot, without corroborating data and analysis, prove what the object was. [GovInfo]govinfo.govCHRG 118hhrg53022CHRG 118hhrg53022
David Grusch’s 2023 testimony had the greatest political blast radius because it alleged concealment. Grusch, a former intelligence official, told Congress that he had provided information to inspectors general and claimed that the government had maintained secret recovery and reverse-engineering programmes involving non-human craft. Yet his public testimony was largely based on information he said he had received from others, not on public presentation of physical evidence. That distinction is crucial: his allegations made oversight urgent, but the public hearing did not independently verify the alleged programmes. [GovInfo]govinfo.govCHRG 118hhrg53022CHRG 118hhrg53022
The 2024 House hearing widened the witness mix. Tim Gallaudet, a retired rear admiral and oceanographer, connected UAP questions to maritime and national-security concerns. Luis Elizondo, a former defence official associated with earlier UAP investigation efforts, argued that the phenomenon was real and that secrecy had obstructed public understanding. Michael Gold, formerly of NASA, emphasised a more scientific and institutional approach. Michael Shellenberger brought a journalist’s focus on alleged whistleblower claims and government secrecy. The witness slate itself showed how the movement had broadened: military, intelligence, space policy, journalism, and advocacy were now all part of the public hearing ecosystem. [Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National…Hearing Date: July 26, 2023 10:00 am 2154 Rayburn Uniden…
The strongest hearings, politically, are the ones that keep those categories separate. A pilot’s account, an intelligence whistleblower’s allegation, a journalist’s source-based claim, a NASA official’s methodological caution, and a Pentagon official’s unresolved-case briefing are not the same kind of evidence. Treating them as identical creates confusion. Treating them separately lets Congress ask better questions: What was observed? What data exist? Who has custody of the records? Who has legal access? Which claims are first-hand? Which claims are classified? Which can be checked?
How hearings turn disclosure into pressure
Hearings do not disclose everything directly. Their power is indirect: they create a public record that other institutions must react to. In the UAP debate, that pressure has worked through several channels.
They reduce stigma for official witnesses. When pilots and defence officials see UAP discussed in Congress, reporting becomes less career-threatening. That does not mean every report is extraordinary; it means the government is more likely to receive reports that would previously have gone unfiled. The Pentagon’s own annual reporting shows increased UAP reporting across government channels, including 291 reports in the FY2023 consolidated report and 757 reports in the FY2024 report covering May 2023 to June 2024 plus earlier reports not previously included. [AARO]aaro.milUNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236UNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236
They force agencies to explain their process. The April 2023 Senate Armed Services subcommittee hearing with AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick was less dramatic than the House whistleblower hearing, but it was important because it centred the office responsible for resolving cases. Kirkpatrick discussed AARO’s mission, budget, analytic work, and examples of cases under review. Reporting from the hearing noted that AARO was reviewing about 650 cases at that time and that some apparent anomalies could be resolved through additional context, while others remained unresolved. [Armed Services Committee]armed-services.senate.govSource details in endnotes. [2U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govFY24 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UAP 508FY24 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UAP 508
They turn classification into a political question. UAP hearings repeatedly run into the same wall: witnesses say more detail is classified, lawmakers ask whether Congress itself has been denied access, and agencies insist that sensitive sources and methods cannot be exposed. That friction is exactly why hearings matter. They do not abolish secrecy, but they make secrecy justify itself in a forum where elected officials can ask whether classification is protecting national security, institutional embarrassment, contractor interests, or something else.
They generate legislation and record-release mechanisms. The clearest example is the push for a UAP records collection. In July 2023, Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds announced legislation modelled on the JFK assassination records process, aiming to direct the National Archives to create a UAP Records Collection and require government offices to identify relevant records. Sections 1841–1843 of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act then required the National Archives to establish an Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection. NARA says UAP records received from agencies are accessioned into Record Group 615 and that the collection will be updated as additional records arrive. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes. [3democrats.senate.gov]democrats.senate.govSchumer, Rounds Introduce New Legislation To DeclassifySchumer, Rounds Introduce New Legislation To Declassify [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
They create oversight trails beyond the hearing room. The Department of Defense Inspector General released an unclassified summary in January 2024 of its evaluation of DoD actions regarding UAP, explaining that the review examined how defence components detected, reported, collected, analysed, and identified UAP. That kind of inspector-general work is less visible than a televised hearing, but it is part of the same pressure system: hearings raise public and congressional attention; oversight bodies then test whether agencies have adequate procedures. [DODIG]dodig.milPress Release: Evaluation of the Do D's Actions RegardingPress Release: Evaluation of the Do D's Actions Regarding
This is why congressional hearings are valuable even when they do not produce a dramatic revelation. They convert a contested public subject into a sequence of official obligations: testify, report, preserve records, answer follow-up questions, brief committees, and defend classification decisions.
What hearings can and cannot establish
The hearings sit at the centre of a difficult evidence problem. They can make claims public, but they cannot automatically make them proven. That difference is where much of the UFO disclosure debate becomes confused.
A congressional hearing can establish that a witness made a statement under oath. It can establish that a committee considered the issue important enough to investigate. It can reveal gaps in agency process, disagreement between officials, or the existence of reporting channels and classified briefings. It can also create political momentum for document preservation and declassification.
But a hearing cannot, on its own, establish the physical origin of an object. For that, investigators need data: sensor calibration, radar tracks, full-motion video, metadata, chain of custody, environmental conditions, satellite or aircraft correlations, witness interviews, and independent analysis. Even then, “unidentified” does not mean “extraterrestrial”; it means the available information has not produced a reliable identification.
NASA’s 2023 UAP independent study made this distinction sharply. The report said there was no conclusive evidence in peer-reviewed scientific literature suggesting an extraterrestrial origin for UAP, and it emphasised that better data were needed to explain anomalous reports. NASA’s public framing was not dismissive of the topic, but it was strict about evidence: unresolved cases are a data problem before they are an origin claim. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportScience Independent Study Team Report
AARO has made a similar institutional point. Its 2024 historical report found no verifiable evidence that any US government investigation, academic-sponsored research, or official review had confirmed extraterrestrial technology, and AARO’s later public statements again said it had found no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial beings, activity, or technology. Those statements do not prove that every UAP has a mundane explanation; they do mean that the official evidentiary threshold for extraordinary claims has not been met publicly. AARO [3U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govFY24 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UAP 508FY24 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UAP 508 Reuters The hearings therefore have a double effect. For disclosure advocates [reuters.com]reuters.comOpen source on reuters.com., they validate the demand for answers: if pilots, intelligence officials, and lawmakers are raising the issue publicly, secrecy and stigma are no longer acceptable default responses. For sceptics, the same hearings confirm the need for discipline: testimony can be sincere, urgent, and politically important while still falling short of proof.
That tension is not a flaw in the hearings. It is their central function. They keep public pressure on institutions without allowing testimony alone to substitute for evidence.
The disclosure movement’s hearing strategy
The modern UFO disclosure movement has learned that “show us the aliens” is a weaker political demand than “show Congress the records, protect witnesses, and explain the process”. Hearings are effective because they translate a culturally loaded subject into governance language.
The strategy works especially well when it asks questions that do not require prior agreement about extraterrestrial life:
- Are military and civilian pilots able to report unusual encounters without stigma?
- Are UAP reports being collected in a standardised way?
- Are defence and intelligence agencies sharing relevant records with the offices legally responsible for review?
- Are contractors holding information that Congress cannot see?
- Are special access programmes being used properly?
- Are unresolved cases genuinely unresolved, or simply under-analysed because data are poor?
- Are public records being preserved before they can be lost, destroyed, or indefinitely buried?
These questions are harder for agencies to dismiss than broad claims about UFOs because they concern procedure, law, and accountability. Even a person who is sceptical of extraordinary UAP claims can support better reporting systems and stronger congressional oversight. That is one reason the issue has produced unusual bipartisan moments: lawmakers may disagree about interpretation, but still agree that Congress should not be kept in the dark about defence programmes, airspace risks, or classified spending.
The hearings also changed media incentives. Earlier UFO coverage often revolved around leaked videos or celebrity advocates. Congressional hearings gave reporters official dates, witness lists, transcripts, committee pages, and government documents to cover. That made the story easier for mainstream outlets to treat as a governance issue rather than a fringe culture story. It also made exaggeration easier, because headlines could blur the line between “Congress heard an allegation” and “Congress confirmed the allegation”. The difference is essential.
The unresolved problem after the cameras switch off
The biggest weakness of hearings as disclosure pressure is that they can raise expectations faster than institutions can produce verifiable answers. Public testimony is immediate; declassification is slow. A witness can make an allegation in minutes; checking it may require classified briefings, inspector-general work, agency searches, contractor records, and legal fights over access. That delay creates a vacuum in which advocates suspect obstruction and sceptics suspect overstatement.
The National Archives process shows both the promise and the slowness of institutional disclosure. The 2024 NDAA created a formal UAP records collection, and NARA guidance required agencies to review, identify, and organise UAP records for public disclosure and transmission. But a records collection is not a single dramatic release; it is an administrative process involving agency searches, classification review, cataloguing, digitisation, and continuing updates. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
AARO’s public case material shows the same pattern in investigative form. Some cases are resolved as balloons or other ordinary objects; others remain under analysis or unresolved because the data are incomplete. That is unsatisfying for people expecting a definitive revelation, but it is how many real investigations work: the outcome is often a better classification of uncertainty, not a cinematic answer. [AARO]aaro.milDr Jon Kosloski Statement for the Record SASC Open Hearing Nov2024Dr Jon Kosloski Statement for the Record SASC Open Hearing Nov2024
This is why hearings are best understood as a pressure valve and a forcing mechanism, not as the final disclosure event. They make silence harder. They make poor process more visible. They give witnesses a public route into oversight. They give lawmakers a reason to demand records. But they still leave the hardest evidentiary work to investigators, archivists, inspectors general, scientists, and committees with access to classified material.
Why “on camera” changed the movement
Putting UFO disclosure on camera changed the movement because it changed the audience. The question was no longer only whether UFO enthusiasts found a case convincing. It became whether Congress, defence agencies, inspectors general, archives, scientists, and the public could agree on a process for handling claims that sit at the edge of secrecy, national security, and extraordinary possibility.
The hearings gave disclosure advocates something they had long lacked: official visibility without requiring immediate proof of the most dramatic claims. That visibility is powerful, but it is also limiting. The more UAP becomes a congressional oversight issue, the more it must survive ordinary standards of evidence: documents, first-hand testimony, sensor data, classification review, audit trails, and reproducible analysis.
That is the lasting importance of the hearings. They did not settle the UFO question. They made it harder for the government to avoid the question, and harder for the disclosure movement to avoid the burden of proof.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Congress Put UFO Disclosure on Camera. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: rev.com
Link: https://www.rev.com/transcripts/congress-holds-historic-open-hearing-on-ufos-5-17-22-transcriptSource snippet
Transcript of Congressional Hearing on UFOsCongress holds historic open hearing on UFOs 5/17/22 Transcript. House Intelligence Counter...
-
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link: https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-implications-on-national-security-public-safety-and-government-transparency/Source snippet
Oversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National...Hearing Date: July 26, 2023 10:00 am 2154 Rayburn Uniden...
Published: July 26, 2023
-
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CHRG 118hhrg53022
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg53022/html/CHRG-118hhrg53022.htm -
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link: https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-exposing-the-truth/ -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CHRG 118hhrg57440
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg57440/html/CHRG-118hhrg57440.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CHRG 118hhrg57440
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg57440/pdf/CHRG-118hhrg57440.pdf -
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf -
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: FY24 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UAP 508
Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Nov/14/2003583603/-1/-1/0/FY24-CONSOLIDATED-ANNUAL-REPORT-ON-UAP-508.PDF -
Source: armed-services.senate.gov
Link: https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/hearings/to-receive-testimony-on-the-mission-activities-oversight-and-budget-of-the-all-domain-anomaly-resolution-office -
Source: war.gov
Link: https://www.war.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/880293/ -
Source: democrats.senate.gov
Title: Schumer, Rounds Introduce New Legislation To Declassify
Link: https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/schumer-rounds-introduce-new-legislation-to-declassify-government-records-related-to-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-and-ufos_modeled-after-jfk-assassination-records-collection-act–as-an-amendment-to-ndaa -
Source: archives.gov
Title: uap guidance
Link: https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/uap-guidance -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-615 -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps -
Source: dodig.mil
Title: Press Release: Evaluation of the Do D’s Actions Regarding
Link: https://www.dodig.mil/In-the-Spotlight/Article/3656428/press-release-evaluation-of-the-dods-actions-regarding-unidentified-anomalous-p/ -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf -
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF -
Source: reuters.com
Link: https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/pentagon-ufo-report-says-most-sightings-ordinary-objects-phenomena-2024-03-08/ -
Source: war.gov
Title: dr jon kosloski director aaro media roundtable on the fy24 consolidated annual
Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3965734/dr-jon-kosloski-director-aaro-media-roundtable-on-the-fy24-consolidated-annual/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Dr Jon Kosloski Statement for the Record SASC Open Hearing Nov2024
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Dr_Jon_Kosloski_Statement_for_the_Record_SASC_Open_Hearing_Nov2024.pdf -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ -
Source: war.gov
Title: dod examining unidentified anomalous phenomena
Link: https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3965403/dod-examining-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/ -
Source: archives.gov
Title: Record Group 615
Link: https://www.archives.gov/findingaid/stat/discovery/615 -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 118-53
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-118hhrg53022/CHRG-118hhrg53022 -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CHRG 119hhrg58900
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-119hhrg58900/html/CHRG-119hhrg58900.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/search/%7B%22query%22%3A%22Aerial%20Phenomena%20Branch%22%7D -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 118-53
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-118hhrg53022 -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2024-01-11/pdf/CREC-2024-01-11.pdf -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Senate Report 119-39
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-119srpt39/html/CRPT-119srpt39.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CREC 2023 11 08 pt1 PgH5550 5
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2023-11-08/html/CREC-2023-11-08-pt1-PgH5550-5.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118shrg60101/html/CHRG-118shrg60101.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Committee on Oversight and Accountability
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/chrg/118/house/Committee%20on%20Oversight%20and%20Accountability -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2023-11-08/pdf/CREC-2023-11-08.pdf -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2025-07-29/pdf/CREC-2025-07-29.pdf -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/44/2107 -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: PLAW 118publ31
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-118publ31/pdf/PLAW-118publ31.pdf -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CRPT 119srpt1
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-119srpt1/html/CRPT-119srpt1.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2023-07-18/pdf/CREC-2023-07-18-senate.pdf -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: PLAW 118publ31
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-118publ31/html/PLAW-118publ31.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2023-07-18/pdf/CREC-2023-07-18.pdf -
Source: govinfo.gov
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg58217/html/CHRG-118hhrg58217.htm -
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: House Report 118-966
Link: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-118hrpt966/html/CRPT-118hrpt966.htm -
Source: war.gov
Link: https://www.war.gov/UFO/ -
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: mace grothman announce joint hearing on unidentified anomalous phenomena
Link: https://oversight.house.gov/release/mace-grothman-announce-joint-hearing-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena%EF%BF%BC/ -
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link: https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-transparency-and-accountability-needed-to-provide-accurate-information-on-uaps-to-the-american-people%EF%BF%BC/ -
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: Written Testimony Elizondo
Link: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Written-Testimony-Elizondo.pdf -
Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link: https://docs.house.gov/committee/calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=117721 -
Source: rules.house.gov
Title: hr 8070
Link: https://rules.house.gov/bill/118/hr-8070 -
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: hearing wrap up government must be more transparent about uaps
Link: https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-government-must-be-more-transparent-about-uaps/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/ -
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/ufos/ -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/ -
Source: reuters.com
Title: us congress panel hold first ufo hearings half century 2022 05 17
Link: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-panel-hold-first-ufo-hearings-half-century-2022-05-17/ -
Source: rev.com
Title: house uap whistleblower hearing
Link: https://www.rev.com/transcripts/house-uap-whistleblower-hearing -
Source: space.com
Link: https://www.space.com/space-exploration/uap-witnesses-criticize-pentagon-ufo-office-in-congressional-hearing-for-using-science-and-coming-up-with-answers -
Source: space.com
Title: pentagon ufo chief tells senate very anomalous objects need careful study video
Link: https://www.space.com/space-exploration/search-for-life/pentagon-ufo-chief-tells-senate-very-anomalous-objects-need-careful-study-video -
Source: gillibrand.senate.gov
Link: https://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/news/press/release/video-gillibrand-opening-statement-at-senate-hearing-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/ -
Source: cbsnews.com
Title: ufo hearing congress pentagon watch live stream today 2022 05 17
Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ufo-hearing-congress-pentagon-watch-live-stream-today-2022-05-17/Source snippet
CBS NewsPentagon officials testify at first public UFO hearing in more...17 May 2022 — A House panel held the first public congressional...
Published: May 2022
-
Source: cbsnews.com
Title: nasa ufo report uap study
Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nasa-ufo-report-uap-study/ -
Source: dvidshub.net
Link: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/880293/dod-official-testifies-before-senate-subcommittee
Additional References
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Americans deserve more than vague denials regarding UAP disclosure: David Grusch
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75fRQfUzZV8Source snippet
Congressional hearing ufo uap disclosure transparency oversight Key moments at House UFO transparency hearing CBS News...
-
Source: axios.com
Title: congress pentagon ufo uap hearing
Link: https://www.axios.com/2022/05/17/congress-pentagon-ufo-uap-hearingSource snippet
A database tracking these sightings has grown to approximately 400 reports, indicating that sightings are frequent and ongoing. The heari...
-
Source: youtube.com
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foEWnCG1jbsSource snippet
House holds hearing on UFOs, government transparency | full video...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: House holds hearing on UFOs, government transparency | full video
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNgoul4vyDMSource snippet
House holds hearing on UFO transparency and whistleblower protection | full video...
-
Source: youtube.com
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu9mw6GHPEMSource snippet
Key moments at House UFO transparency hearing...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Key moments at House UFO transparency hearing
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0Sjv30bCioSource snippet
Americans deserve more than vague denials regarding UAP disclosure: David Grusch...
-
Source: dni.gov
Title: 3733 2023 consolidated annual report on unidentified anomalous phenomena
Link: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2023/3733-2023-consolidated-annual-report-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena -
Source: researchgate.net
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374373111_UFOs_and_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena_The_NASA_report_1492023_has_found_no_evidence_to_suggest_that_UAPs_are_extraterrestrial_in_origin -
Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3A2023House_Oversight_and_Accountability_Hearing_on_UAP%E2%80%93Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena%E2%80%93_Implications_on_National_Security%2C_Public_Safety%2C_and_Government_Transparency.webm -
Source: ufotransparency.com
Link: https://ufotransparency.com/files/decade-2020s-nara-uap-records-collection-rg615-rg-615-collection-page-national-archives
Topic Tree